I ordered two reports on consecutive days for a site I’m building. The first showed my start page at 111 words, one heading and no structured data. Competitor keywords came with volumes and a difficulty score, and the biggest one, 165,000 searches a month, had no page on my site. Twelve buyer questions went unanswered, and none of eight AI answers about my topic named me. The phased plan at the end gave me an order for the work.

The second report went wrong. I ordered it after my changes to see progress, and it still showed one page read, 111 words and no structured data. The methodology page gave the page source date as the day before my changes, and the run cost another 25 credits. I can’t tell whether that’s a cache or a bug, so I asked in the Q&A.

A follow-up report that shows only what changed, for fewer credits, would solve most of this. Read, fix, check again is the normal way to work, and at full price I now hold back on re-checking. A note on how fresh the data is would help too.

Update (Oct 21): Ahmed replied the same day. My second report had used an old copy of my site. The credits were refunded, and the cache now lasts 24 hours at most. He counted my vote for a cheaper follow-up report that shows only changes, but gave no date. I raised my rating from 4 to 5 tacos. A fast reply and a solved problem are what I expect from a software provider.